

Несколько внезапный подход к рассмотрению проблемы эксплуатации исламскими террористами терминологии пассионарной теории этногенеза. Факты, приводимые автором, блестяще подтверждают тезис П.Корявцева, еще четверть века назад назад изложенный в его “Философии антисистем”: антисистемы могут принимать на вооружение абсолютно любую доктрину, в том числе и саму теорию антисистем.
This article analyses Russian elements in the texts of Said Buriatskii (1982–2010), who in the late 2000s was one of the main ideologists and symbols of the internationalist Islamist resistance in the North Caucasus. Trying to explain the importance and validity of jihad, Buriatskii referred to the concepts of the famous Soviet historian and anthropologist Lev Gumilev and brought Islamic radicalism closer to a Russian-speaking audience by using Gumilev’s terminology. Indeed, he found some appreciation among Russian radical journalists, and even among oppositionists from a background close to the Russian Orthodox Church. This article therefore argues that, in spite of his Islamic rhetoric, Buriatskii can also be understood as aspiring to achieve the status of a Russian public intellectual, particularly as a representative of a broader movement that emphasizes values such as sincerity and passion.
//”Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations”, Vol.28(№2), P.203-218.
Если вы нашли ошибку, пожалуйста, выделите фрагмент текста и нажмите Ctrl+Enter.