Why the US is Finally Talking to Russia

Метки: ,
FavoriteLoadingПометить для себя
Why the US is Finally Talking to Russia
5 (100%) 1 голосов
Оригинал публикации  Скачать в формате электронной книги


(updated 16:35 19.05.2015)
Pepe Escobar

So a woman walks into a room… That’s how quite a few jokes usually start. In our case, self-appointed Queen of Nulandistan Victoria “F**k the EU” walks into a room in Moscow to talk to Russian deputy foreign ministers Sergei Ryabkov and Grigory Karasin.

A joke? Oh no; that really happened. Why?

Let’s start with the official reactions. Karasin qualified the talks as “fruitful”, while stressing Moscow does not approve of Washington becoming part of the Normandy-style (Russia, Ukraine, Germany and France) negotiations on Ukraine. Not after the relentless demonization not only of the Kremlin but also of Russia as a whole since the Maidan coup.

Ryabkov, for his part, made it known the current state of the US-Russia relationship remains, well, corrosive.

It’s crucial to remember the Queen of Nulandistan went to Moscow only after meeting with certified Washington vassal President Poroshenko and her own, hand-picked Prime Minister, “Yats”; and that was before accompanying Secretary of State John Kerry on the full regalia State Department trip to Sochi on May 12.

The Minsk-2 agreement – the actual product of the Normandy-style negotiations – directly involved Berlin and Paris, who finally saw the realpolitik on the wall and were compelled to divert from Washington’s monomaniac antagonistic approach.Inside the EU, chaos remains on the key subject of sanctions. The Baltics and Poland toe the “Russians are coming!” Cold War 2.0 hysteria line, while the adults in Brussels are represented by Italy, Greece, Spain and Hungary.

So Germany and France are already in deep trouble keeping the messy EU house in order. At the same time Berlin and Paris know nothing the self-described “Don’t Do Stupid Stuff” Obama administration pulls off will mollify Moscow to abandon its precise red lines.

Обратите внимание:  Anticipating Putin’s Next Gamble

Watch Those Red Lines

It’s crucial to notice that Crimea does not seem to be on the table anymore; it’s a fait accompli. But then there are those U.S. “military trainers” who have been deployed to western Ukraine only for a “six-month mission” (historical reminder; this is how the Vietnam war started). For Moscow, expansion of this “mission” is an absolute red line.

And then there’s the ultimate red line; NATO expansion, which remains unabated in the Baltics, Poland, Romania and Bulgaria. That won’t stop; it’s part of NATO’s obsession in solidifying a new Iron Curtain from the Baltics to the Black Sea.

Thus, beyond all the talking, the next step to watch is whether the Obama administration will really refrain from weaponizing Kiev.

Ukraine for all practical purposes is now a massively indebted failed state turned into an IMF colony. The EU does not want it – although NATO does. For Moscow, the – ghastly – show will only be over when Ukraine, with or without the people’s republics of Donetsk and Lugansk, is neutral, and not part of a NATO strategic threat.

I have examined here the possibility that the Obama administration’s strategic shift towards talking instead of cursing/threatening may signify that the real Masters of the Universe have finally understood the emerging New (Silk) World Order is bound to leave them behind.

President Putin knew that he was heading towards a major confrontation with the US after the dismemberment of Yugoslavia, the Georgian adventure, and NATO’s ceaseless expansion violating all those empty promises to Gorbachev.The difference is that now – and the Pentagon knows it – Moscow has amassed up to 10,000 tactical nuclear weapons. In the – apocalyptic — event of a war between Russia with NATO, the wet dream of many a US neo-con, these tactical nuclear weapons would knock out every commercial and military airfield of every NATO country in twenty minutes. That would leave no airfield for NATO combined air operations.

Обратите внимание:  Бобров А. Глубинный путинизм или Куда уходит Русь?

And then there’s the S-500 missile defense system, which can protect Russia against any form of Pentagon/NATO nuclear missile retaliation. No US offensive weapon, including Stealth bombers, could get through the S-500 maze, and the Pentagon also knows it.

Strategy? What Strategy?

The Dr. Zbig “Grand Chessboard” Brzezinski-style strategy has always been to lure Russia into another Afghanistan in Ukraine, leading to a collapse of the Russian economy with the Big Prize being a Western takeover of Russia’s oil and natural gas wealth, and by extension Central Asia’s. Ukrainians would be used as cannon fodder, as were Afghans since the 1980s Arab-Afghan jihad.

Yet the Obama administration overplayed its hand, and realpolitik now spells out the deepening of the Russia-China strategic partnership across the entire Eurasian land mass; Eurasia as a prospective, massive commercial emporium stretching from Beijing to Berlin, or from Shanghai to St. Petersburg and beyond towards Rotterdam and Duisburg.

Without the exceptionalist obsession of some key Beltway factions, none of the elements of Cold War 2.0 would be in play, as Russia is a natural ally of the US in many fronts. That in itself reveals the state of “strategic thinking” by the current US administration.

Moscow, anyway, won’t be caught off-guard by the current, barely disguised, charm offensive, because Russian intelligence knows that may well veil a “Grand Chessboard”-style tactic of two steps back to regroup for a massive advance later.

Moreover, nothing has basically changed other than the original, dissuasive Cold War era MAD – Mutually Assured Destruction – doctrine being over.

The US still retains PGS (Prompt Global Strike) capability. Ukraine is just a detail. The real game-changer will happen when Russia is able to seal its whole territory, via the S-500s, against PGS. That will happen sooner than anyone thinks. And that’s why the real Masters of the Universe – via their emissaries – feel compelled to talk.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Sputnik.

Если вы нашли ошибку, пожалуйста, выделите фрагмент текста и нажмите Ctrl+Enter.

(Просмотров: 16)
Категории Политика, метки , . Постоянная ссылка.


12.05.2021 - Сазонов С. Д. Воспоминания ... 11.05.2021 - Грузнова Е.Б. На распутье Средневековья. Языческие традиции в русском простонародном быту (конец XV–XVI вв.). ... 10.05.2021 - Клеман К., Мирясова О., Демидов, А. От обывателей к активистам: зарождающиеся социальные движения в современной России ... 09.05.2021 - В.И.Ленин. Неизвестные документы. 1891-1922 гг. ... 08.05.2021 - Палеолог М. Царская Россия во время мировой войны ... 07.05.2021 - Atwood H.C. The Master Workman Or True Masonic Guide ... 06.05.2021 - Меркулов В.И. Варяго-русский вопрос в немецкой историографии первой половины XVIII века ... 05.05.2021 - Мы не немы! Антропология протеста в России 2011-2012 годов. ... 04.05.2021 - Ашкар (аль-Ашкар) У.С. Мир джиннов и шайтанов ... 03.05.2021 - Езник Кохбаци. Опровержение лжеучений. ... 02.05.2021 - Atlas of medieval Europe ... 29.04.2021 - Юрьев А.И. Деструктивные политические эпидемии, опыт системного исследования ... 27.04.2021 - Цымбурский В. Морфология российской геополитики и динамика международных систем XVIII-XX веков ... 26.04.2021 - Особый путь. От идеологии к методу. ... 24.04.2021 - Эзовъ Г. Объ ученiи персидскихъ маговъ ... 22.04.2021 - Белякова О. В. Экзорцим: одержимые, изгнание бесов ... 20.04.2021 - О методах и приемах иностранных разведывательных органов и их троцкистско-бухаринской агентуры ... 18.04.2021 - Мар-Мани мироточивый ... 17.04.2021 - Макиавелли Н. Избранные сочинения ... 16.04.2021 - Шкуратенко О.В. Поняття, розвиток, етимологія жаргону кримінального та його місце в субкультурному просторі (історико-правовий аспект) ... на главную

Добавить комментарий

Войти с помощью: 

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *